The first is the Melvin Memorial. This is French's copy of the centerpiece, a figure of Victory who seems to be emerging out of the stone veiled by the American flag. This was made for the tomb monument of 3 brothers who all died together in the Civil War. The monument was commissioned by the surviving 4th brother about 40 years after their deaths. French's copy in the Met is less a copy, than a much altered variation on the monument. French moved the figure of Victory from left to right in the copy.
I really enjoy French's work, and the work of the American Renaissance in general. One of the things I enjoy most about it is the pronounced element of sexuality in all of this work. Yes, we fixate a lot on sex these days, but our libidos play a much larger role in creativity than we, or the generations of the late 19th century, liked to acknowledge. And that has been true, and will be true, as long as we are human. Unlike a lot of 19th century artists, French does a very fine job of integrating those very personal and physical passions into forms that are supposed to articulate public ideas.
Everyone's favorite monument by French is the Milmore Memorial. The original is in bronze, and still stands in a cemetery outside Boston. It was made for the tomb of another sculptor who was a close friend of French, Martin Milmore, who died at 39 from liver disease. Martin's brother Joseph, a stonecutter who frequently collaborated with his brother, also lies buried in the tomb. While I've not seen the bronze original in person, I think French's marble copy for the Met is wonderful.
Yes, I think he's hot. So much NeoClassical art, including public monuments, is full of hot young athletes. French carved a lot of them. So did Frank McMonies. We notice these days, but I doubt anyone (publicly or in print anyway) noticed the sexuality in these figures back then. It was an unspoken assumption widely accepted at the time that men were not sex objects. Eakins could go skinny dipping with his male students and no one would notice (maybe they should have), while taking the figleaf off of a female model got him fired from the Pennsylvania Academy.
I don't think this monument lost anything by being transcribed into marble. It may have even gained a whole new resonance and mystery, a kind of deathly pallor and veiled quality that bronze can't have.

4 comments:
I have an eye for hot guys in sculpture, and I never saw these works at the Met. Beautiful stuff. Lovely writing. Thank you, Doug.
Wonderful.
So does anyone, suspect French was, y'know? [I mean, the @ss on the young artist: golly! ;-p]
Well I suspect he was, based on the evidence of his work.
It's to the point where I presume that all the NeoClasicals are gay until I find out otherwise. The only certainly straight ones I can think of are Ingres and Saint Gaudens.
Guerin, Girodet, Flaxman, Thorvaldsen, McMonies, Rude, Flandrin, even the great JL David, all sisters.
It's to the point where I presume that all the NeoClasicals are gay until I find out otherwise.
Well, if they're adopting "the practices of the Ancient Greeks", it figgers!
Post a Comment