Sunday, November 8, 2009

The Fall of the Wall

The Berlin Wall fell 20 years ago Monday November 9. Germany and much of the rest of Europe are remembering and celebrating.

Germany is reunited after 45 years of separation. The Soviet Empire and its occupation are over. The Stasi is closed (and its files are wide open showing how much spying, lying, and blackmail was going on).

There is another aspect to the End of the Cold War best captured at the time by the great cartoonist Pat Oliphant in 1989.



There was an old joke in Eastern Europe during the Cold War that said, "Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's the other way around."

ADDENDUM:
Here are some very similar musings by Slavoj Zisek in the NY Times.  He recalls the sad and revealing story of a now forgotten star of the Cold War, Viktor Kravchenko, author of the once celebrated best-selling book I Chose Freedom.  He fell through the ideological cracks after the success of that book, becoming as deeply disillusioned with ideological capitalism as he once was with ideological communism.

There is a story about George Orwell (I wish I could remember the details) attending the lecture of a pioneering British conservative ideologue.  This right wing British intellectual denounced liberal pluralism and the enervating effect of liberal cosmopolitanism on society.  He insisted that we were unprepared to meet the challenge of communist aggression.  He called for the remilitarization of society to face the communist threat.  Orwell congratulated him on his lecture and then said, "I don't think you fear the communists so much as you envy them."
To my mind, that is the epitaph of the whole Cold War.

Black Velvet, If You Please

Alright folks, we missed the bus to the museum, so let's head out to the airport Marriott to look at an American art form (if you don't mind that so many of these are mass produced in Mexico), the painting on black velvet. I learned some of my first real lessons in painting technique from looking at these paint scumbles on black nylon velvet. I learned scumbling, even before I knew the word, and I learned a little about tone and chiaroscuro.

Before we get too high on our horses, let's remember that Italy, France, and China each have magnificent and ancient traditions of kitsch. Do you really think most of that stuff recovered from the ruins of Pompeii, the Las Vegas of ancient Rome, would have been considered fine art in their day? Pliny turned up his nose at it in disgust. Lord knows what the Divine Tiberius had decorating his gardens and villas on Capri, but it's a safe assumption that it was closer in spirit to the art below than to the demanding aesthetics of Polykleitos.
Some artists these days actually take this stuff seriously. Julian Schnabel did some works on black velvet. But, let's face it, Schnabel ain't no Velazquez and couldn't paint his way out of a paper bag. Let's hope he sticks to movies. Elizabeth Murray used the lurid colors and screaming high contrasts of this budget art form with much more subtlety and to more poetic effect.

So let's set sail through the shallow seas of budget aesthetics. These things are either mass produced on the cheap, usually in Mexico, or they are the work of earnest amateurs. When Americans dream on the cheap, they dream on black velvet.





We can't do a post on black velvet paintings without clown pictures.



This one is actually a little better than most.




And let's not forget unicorns, especially unicorns in space.

It's remarkable how the subject matter of these things has changed over the years. When I was a kid, it was clowns, Jesus, matadors & senoritas, and vaguely tropical landscapes. Now it's Kiss, babes, sci-fi, and unicorns.



Flying unicorns in space. Someone somewhere must be doing a paper on unicorns in popular American culture. To me, they are very phallic male metaphors.



And everyone's favorite, dogs playing poker.



Time to get serious now. Here is some religious work, Jesus and Elvis. A standard issue Jesus meets Elvis who has a brighter halo. Jesus seems to be deferring to him. Elvis here is 1970's sentimental drug addict Elvis, not sexy 1950s Elvis. I wonder what this is all about?



And we end with the amateur copy of Leonardo's Last Supper hanging askew in a used furniture store.

Art is indeed all around us.

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Damn the Trolls, Full Speed Ahead!


My beloved trolls and stalkers will be happy to learn that I will continue this blog. I've gotten a number of appeals from fans in comments and through private emails not to act on that first impulse to shut this thing down.

So, I won't.

I found a good site with some sensible advice on how to identify and deal with trolls, spammers, and stalkers. It contains some ways to spot troublemakers like the following:

An article on Computer World.com has a LOT of important information about different types of online abuse:

Spamming troll: Posts to many newsgroups with the same verbatim post.

Kooks: A regular member of a forum who habitually drops comments that have no basis on the topic or even in reality.

Flamer: Does not contribute to the group except by making inflammatory comments.

Hit-and-runner: Stops in, make one or two posts and move on.

Psycho trolls: Has a psychological need to feel good by making others feel bad.

Cyberstalkers

Cyberstalkers can also assume many different forms, according to Wood, although they’re basically characterized by a continuing pattern of communication that the recipient considers to be offensive. Other common traits of cyberstalkers are malice, premeditation, repetition, distress to the victim, an obsession on the part of the stalker, seeking of revenge, threats that make victims fear for their physical safety and disregarded warnings to stop.

As with trolls, there are several different types of cyberstalkers, according to Wood:

Intimate partner: The most common type of stalker, this is usually a man who has a history of controlling and emotional abuse during a relationship.

Delusional stalkers: This type of stalker builds an entire relationship with the victim in his or her mind, whether any prior contact has taken place or not. Such stalkers are likely to have a major mental illness such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or erotomania, which means they believe the victim is in love with them. The typical delusional stalker is unmarried, socially immature and a loner who is unable to sustain close relationships with others.

Vengeful stalker: This type of person is angry with the victim due to some real or imagined insult or injury. Some of these stalkers are psychopaths — a person affected with an antisocial personality disorder — who have no conscience or remorse. They may have paranoid delusions, often feeling that they themselves are victims and are striving to get even.

Could any of these be you, my trollish darlings?

The question remains, to comment moderate, or not to comment moderate? I've tried it for awhile, and frankly I'm inclined not to use it. I think it dampens the conversation, and troll comments will get zapped anyway whether I moderate them or not. This website suggests keeping a log of regular trolls and troll comments just in case a report needs to be made to the blog police (or to the real police).

So, it looks like I will stay in business after all. I do need the outlet to hold forth, and occasionally to vent.

Maybe It's Time to Shut This Down

It seems like my blog has become a magnet for spam and some really nasty trolls. I'm giving serious thought to shutting it down. I'm very busy with my job these days with the responsibilities piling up. I don't have the time I once did to spend with this thing.
I have students and colleagues, as well as a partner, for whom I am responsible. I see them daily, and their needs take precedence over what ever might come my way in text form through the cyber-ether. I don't have the time or the inclination to deal with obsessives who leave drive-by comments reminding me of how much they hate me and all I stand for. Instead of opinionating and rehashing art history lectures, perhaps I should be spending more of that energy in my studio, what little time I have right now to spend there.

This blog is a great outlet for me. I don't usually get to hold forth. Academic life, far from being free and open, comes with a million and one constraints, official and unofficial. Michael doesn't really share my interests much. I don't get to talk shop much with other artists these days like I once did. I don't really get much opportunity to opinionate. So, I would miss this little self-made soapbox and exhibition hall. But, it is getting to be another source of stress and irritation, and one that I can afford to lose.

I haven't made a decision yet, but faithful readers, I will keep you posted. Thanks for your thoughts, your comments, your criticisms, and dissents. I've enjoyed and learned from them all. Perhaps we can continue this conversation in some kind of modified form.

Friday, November 6, 2009

Beautiful Buildings: The Lost Taj Mahal of The Bronx and The Hall of Fame

I have taught art at Bronx Community College now for 7 years. It is a struggling perpetually underfunded community college in the City University of New York system serving students from one of the poorest counties in the United States. My students are predominantly African American, Hispanic, and immigrants from everywhere, mostly from the Caribbean, West Africa, Latin America, and South Asia, with a substantial number from East Asia and Eastern Europe.

In the middle of the campus is the lost Taj Mahal of the Bronx, Gould Memorial Library, with what was once one of New York's most famous landmarks, and is now almost completely forgotten; the Hall of Fame. No, not just any hall of fame, THE Hall of Fame. All of the others are but copies and spinoffs of this one. It is officially known as the Hall of Fame of Great Americans inaugurated in 1900 on land donated to New York University by Helen Gould, a graduate of the university's law school, and a daughter of the notorious robber baron Jay Gould.
The project was initiated by a chancellor of NYU, Henry Mitchell McCracken, and built on top of a ridge overlooking the Harlem river toward Fort Tryon Park in Manhattan. The ridge was occupied by British forces in the invasion of New York in 1776. From there they shelled Fort Tryon and drove out the American defenders. McCracken said he wanted to occupy the ridge once again, only with a contingent of the best Americans ever, lead by Washington himself, and to hold it forever.

The once famous architect Stanford White was commissioned to build the new university campus and the Hall of Fame. The Gould Memorial Library was to be the centerpiece of the whole campus, and the central building around which the Hall of Fame was built.

Here is a photograph of Gould Memorial Library taken shortly after it was finished in 1899. The photo is probably from sometime around 1900. You can see on either side the newly finished Hall of Fame.


Here is Gould Memorial Library today. It was modeled on the Roman Pantheon, and more closely on Jefferson's Library for the University of Virginia campus (which White restored after a fire destroyed its dome and interior). It is not a large building. The dome is only about 80 feet high. But it is an extravagant little building.


The building is built of straw colored brick and limestone with amazingly elaborate copper and terra-cotta trim on the roof and around the outside of the dome.

At the time, this building was considered one of White's finest works. It is not only extravagant, but beautifully proportioned, tackling very elegantly the old problem of reconciling the Pantheon's square facade with its round dome and rotunda. The awkwardness of the original challenged all kinds of architects beginning with Palladio to come up with better solutions. White sticks closely to the original, adding a lengthy hall containing a grand staircase behind the columned portico. The triangular pediments seem to rise one behind the other easily and inevitably into the round copper dome.

Stanford White is now more famous for his lurid death than for his architecture. He was murdered in 1906 in his suite in the old Madison Square Garden by Henry Thaw, husband of White's former mistress, the famously beautiful Evelyn Nesbitt. The murder and subsequent trial was a tabloid sensation, the first of many trials "... of the century!" (the last "trial of the century" I suppose was OJ Simpson's).
White's own role as the lover of the beautiful under age Nesbitt cast him as a villain in all kinds of literature and in movies, most famously in EL Doctorow's Ragtime.

Stanford White may have been a scoundrel, but he really was a great architect. He was a leader in the American Renaissance movement to bring classical clarity and unity to American public architecture, which was formerly an extravagant mishmash of vaguely understood historical styles. The historicism of that movement, and his role in it, made him a villain again in the eyes of modernist criticism for decades. Many of his buildings were either torn down or modified to suit modernist taste. His most famous remaining buildings are the Boston Public Library and the Washington Square Arch in New York. It was White and the American Renaissance that first brought to the United States that William Morris Arts and Crafts Movement idea of the total integration of all the arts of architecture, sculpture, painting, and craft into single total works of art; an idea that would profoundly influence Frank Lloyd Wright and in turn, influence European International Modernists.


Here is a detail of an allegorical panel "Music" from a set of bronze doors added to the library after White's death as a memorial to him. They prepare us for the extravagance of the interior within.



Here is the interior of the rotunda of the Gould Library. The columns are of imported Irish green marble. The column capitals are all gilded. The surviving stained glass and other decoration is the creation of Tiffany's. This was once the main reading room. The stacks were originally in small rooms behind the columns on two levels. The circle in the floor was once a glass floor letting sunlight into the auditorium on the lower floor. The stack rooms and study rooms still have glass floors and ceilings for the sunlight. It is a splendid and opulent room, one of the most beautiful in New York, and that's saying a lot.


Here is the interior of the dome with statues of the Muses ringing the rim. In the top was once a magnificent skylight designed and built by the Tiffany firm. It was destroyed in 1969 when an antiwar anarchist detonated a firebomb in the auditorium below. The auditorium was almost totally destroyed. The blast broke through the glass floor and destroyed the skylight above. It has been covered over ever since making the room unnaturally dark. I hear there are plans to restore the skylight, though the fire department forbids the college from restoring the glass floor.



Here is the Hall of Fame added by White to the slope behind Gould Library in 1900. He may have intended this to be the main entrance to the college with big arched doorways to the right and left of the round podium. You can see one of those original entrances behind the tree to the right.



Here is the interior of the Hall, as restrained as the Library is extravagant. The view across the river into Fort Tryon Park and toward the New Jersey Pallisades is splendid. It is lined with bronze busts chosen by jury. Each occupies a single bay with a bronze plaque identifying them and their achievements.


I look at this beautifully simple hall with its almost perfect sense of interval and proportion, and I can only conclude that no one knows how to design anything quite like this anymore.



Here is the bust of Jefferson with Gould Library in the background. The Hall and the Library have fallen on hard times over the last 40 years. This began as NYU's main campus, but the decline of the surrounding Bronx neighborhood after World War II, and the expansion of the downtown campus (originally intended for night classes) caused the campus and buildings to suffer neglect. Also, critical fashion of the time frowned on White and his classicism. The last buildings built on that campus were a series of aggressively and brutally modernist buildings designed by Marcel Breuer of Bauhaus fame. They were built in the mid 1960s.
NYU sold the campus to CUNY in 1973 which made it the new campus of Bronx Community College. Bronx Community College never really neglected the buildings, but they've never had the funds to properly restore and care for them. There are cracked panes and broken light fixtures here and there.

The Hall of Fame itself has become somewhat controversial. It is very much a hall of dead white males reflecting the tastes and prejudices of a century ago. There are few women, and until recently, the only Black folk were Booker T. Washington and George Washington Carver (a bust of Dr. ML King was added in the 1980s). There are few people among the bronze busts that look like the students at the college today. The college has decided to embrace the Hall anyway and create a Hall of Fame scholarship and a series of virtual halls of fame for women, African Americans, etc. The Hall of Fame foundation still exists, and the bays are not yet filled up, so it is still possible that more busts will be added.

I wonder if anyone will notice if that happens. Inductions into the Hall of Fame were once huge ceremonies attended by thousands and addressed by Presidents of the United States. I can't see anything like that happening again. I wonder if "Fame" really means anything in an age that produces so many people who are famous only for being famous (Paris Hilton anyone?). I wonder if "Fame" means anything in an age where people rarely distinguish between fame, celebrity, and notoriety (the pathetnoids responsible for the Columbine Massacre were apparently motivated by a psychotic craving for fame, no matter what kind it was).

Regardless with what our fickle and nihilistic little age does with concepts like "fame," the glories of these sadly neglected monuments will outlast it, and lend luster to others who will continue the roll call of the great in this country. Perhaps someday one of our own students will win a place in the Hall.

I love these buildings, and I doubt that I will ever get tired of them.

ADDENDUM:

What an irony it is that the Hall of Fame is itself forgotten. Only the occasional very enterprising tourist ventures up to the Bronx and talks their way past security at the gate to see these buildings. Inscribed over one of the entrances is "They Live Forever." Indeed, this monument was designed and built to last forever. It has survived almost 50 years of neglect very gracefully; more so than Marcel Breuer's buildings which today look like yesterday's science fiction, and are a nightmare to maintain. It is remarkable that the founders of this project never imagined that the monument itself would be forgotten. They imagined that it would be the monument, and the honored company within, that would hallow names added to it for all time. They meant it to be a kind of Olympus of merit and achievement, something to inspire the ambitions of later generations. It was inspired by earlier very nationalistic monuments built in Germany in the early 19th century in the wake of Napoleon's occupation; monument's like Leo Von Klenze's Valhalla near Regensburg, a kind of temple to Germany's greats built by the King of Bavaria in his bid to try to unite Germany under Bavaria. We certainly can't deny the nationalist content of the Hall of Fame.
There are times when I've thought about the revival of the Hall of Fame, primarily as a historical tourist attraction to generate revenue for the college, but also the idea that the Hall represents something on-going, and maybe the occasional generational revisions and additions should be part of its continuing life. But, I wonder if fame and glory mean much anymore.
Ours is a celebrity culture, and celebrities, like everything else in a consumer economy, are product before they are people. They are celebrities, not because of some great accomplishment or contribution, but because we desire them for whatever reason. As George WS Trow once asked 25 years ago, is there any celebrity as successful as Coca Cola? Another problem is that so much success these days carries a taint of corruption; even when there's not, we are conditioned to assume that there is. That is true now even for historical figures. I suppose this is the equal and opposite reaction to so much dubious hero worship in the preceding century. It may also be another symptom of the nihilism of our age that worships power and money, not because they're so wonderful, but because we can't agree on anything else.

Thought for the Day

--The official unemployment rate in the United States is now 10.2%, the highest since 1983. The broadest measure of unemployment, the U6 index, puts the rate at over 17%.

--We've had 2 more gun rampages in the last 24 hours with a total of 14 dead.

--The war in Afghanistan is rapidly becoming the latest in a series of military quagmires.

--Economists are warning that the foreclosure crisis, far from being over, is about to go through a second and even bigger wave, this one created by the unemployment and under-employment created by the first wave of the crisis. Thousands more people will lose their homes and join the ranks of the poor. No matter what policy or ideology is pursued in Washington, it won't matter. The middle class created by the post WWII boom is being wiped out.

And yet, religious conservatives complain about the "smorgasbord" quality of modern life, that everyone picks and chooses their way through this world according to what makes them comfortable.

It looks more to me like most people these days are groaning in the iron chains of Necessity and don't seem to have any choice about much of anything now.

Fundamentalists don't really need heaven, but they need hell. Without it, their vision of Christianity-as-protection-racket ("Turn or Burn!") could not possibly work. Without hell, that imperial cult of legalism and machismo which some call Christianity would lose its power to conquer and to frighten into submission.

Predictions About How the News Will Play Out

Apparently the man responsible for the gun rampage at Fort Hood yesterday acted alone. He was not killed, but wounded and captured. He was a career military man in the army medical corps working as a psychiatrist with many years experience working at Walter Reed in Bethesda. He was born and raised in Roanoake, Virginia, the son of Palestinian immigrants from a small town near Jerusalem. He joined the military against his parents' wishes. The accused gunman is a Muslim. Both of his parents died separately almost 10 years ago, and he became more religious after their deaths. Accounts say he was desperate to avoid deployment to Iraq. There are some accounts that say he was harassed in the military for being Muslim (maybe, but there are still a lot of Muslims in the military and have been for years; some of the veterans I've taught were Muslims from West Africa and the Middle East).

To me, this is beginning to look like yet another random gun rampage. But, since the accused gunman was a Muslim and a Palestinian (though an American by birth), and this took place on an army base, I'm sure the speculative mills are grinding away furiously. One media "expert" has already declared this to be the work of Al Qaida. I suspect Texas Muslims are bunkering down yet again. It is a very bad trait of human nature to draw very general conclusions from very particular events, and I'm sure there are lots of people right now doing just that. There will be the usual solemn discussions by Very Serious People on Muslims as potential security risks in the military. What will probably emerge is the story of an already unbalanced man who went berserk. Military or not, this man should probably never have been carrying a gun, or had access to one.

Meanwhile, there are the families and friends of 12 people who now suddenly find themselves unexpectedly bereaved. There are over 30 people injured and facing a long process of recovery. Perhaps there is where our attention and energies should be focused.